A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP
BUSINESS & CIVIL
MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE
REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
CORPORATE LEGAL SERVICES
Masserman & Ducey, LLP provides excellent and quality legal services for businesses and individuals with valid legal needs and specializes in several different areas of practice.
In addition to our full array of litigation services, Masserman & Ducey offers pre-litigation solutions to client problems, guiding efforts toward early dispute resolution in an effort to avoid unnecessary expenses of litigation.
The exceptional quality of legal services we have afforded our clients over the years has sustained our ability to maintain long-term client relationships.
At Masserman & Ducey, we are confident that our combination of communication skills, team approach, and philosophy of ethics and excellence in the legal representation we provide our clients will be designed to suit your own legitimate legal needs.
RECENT TRIAL RESULTS
Below are summaries of recent trial results for defendants we represented.
The 21-year-old decedent’s mother filed suit against our client, who owned a property where her daughter died of a heroin overdose. In two consolidated cases, plaintiff also sued three of her daughter’s health care providers, a drug treatment center, a drug interventionist and a celebrity who, like our client, allowed plaintiff’s daughter to stay at her home. The trial proceeded in Pasadena Superior Court against our client, the other homeowner and the interventionist. Plaintiff sought $24 million in damages at trial. On February 11, 2019, after a 19-day jury trial and three days of deliberations, the jury returned a unanimous defense verdict in favor of our client and the celebrity homeowner, and a majority defense verdict in favor of the interventionist. The jury verdict was upheld on appeal.
Our client is a manufacturer and seller of lighting equipment used in amateur photography, which was sued in 2015 by a competing company for a declaration of invalidity of our client’s patent on a lamp holder used as part of a photography lighting kit. Our client filed a cross-claim for patent infringement. In late 2017, we were brought in as trial counsel. The jury trial commenced on May 21, 2019. After a 5-day trial and 2 days of deliberations, the jury unanimously found in favor of our client that the competing manufacturer infringed our client’s patent and there was willful infringement, awarding our client the full amount of its damages sought for lost profits in the sum of $138,363.00. On our post-trial motion for treble damages, the Court granted the motion and awarded $415,089.00 in treble damages. On our post-trial motion for attorney's fees, the Court granted the motion and awarded attorney's fees in the sum of $496,123.90. As part of the judgment, the Court also granted our cost bill, pre-judgment interest, and post-judgment interest, bringing the total judgment in favor of our client to over $1 million. The competitor is not appealing the judgment.
The plaintiff was inspecting a trellis in the backyard of the defendant’s property when he fell from a ladder provided by the defendant, who was out of the country. The plaintiff claimed that the ladder was dangerous and defective causing his fall. The plaintiff sustained an open right ankle fracture and underwent surgery for fixation of the ankle leaving residual scarring. The plaintiff sought $550,000 at trial. After a 5-day trial the jury returned a unanimous defense verdict. The case, decided by the jury on April 26, 2018, was the first state court trial conducted in the Spring Street courthouse. Read more >>
The plaintiff was a United States Postal Service worker delivering mail to the defendant homeowner’s property, when a dog owned by the defendant tenant, the homeowner’s mother, burst out the front door and caused the plaintiff to fall. The plaintiff sustained a left wrist fracture and scaphulate ligament tear necessitating surgery, and orthopedic injuries. We prevailed on a motion for summary adjudication for the owner and trial proceeded between the plaintiff and the tenant/dog owner. The plaintiff requested $350,000 at trial. After a 6-day trial the jury returned a verdict of $30,000, and reduced the recovery to $16,800 by allocating negligence at 56% to the defendant and 44% to the plaintiff.
The plaintiff was a realtor who fell on wet paint on the sidewalk of a property owned by an investment company whose manager was also sued. We admitted liability for the entity and denied liability for the manager. The plaintiff sustained severe coccyx and low back injuries and underwent a back surgery and two rhizotomies. The plaintiff claimed $290,000 in medical expenses and sought $800,000 at trial. The Court granted our motion for nonsuit on behalf of the manager. After an 8-day trial the jury returned a verdict against the entity for $48,669, including $8,669 in economic damages and $40,000 in noneconomic damages.
The plaintiff was driving on the I-101 freeway when he was rear-ended by the defendant, who was driving a vehicle owned by his business. Liability was admitted. The plaintiff claimed injuries to his back, neck, arms and hands, both knees, and ongoing headaches. The plaintiff sought over $110,000 in medical expenses and loss of earnings. After our motions in limine were granted excluding the plaintiff’s experts from testifying at trial, the plaintiff settled on the first day of trial for a minimal amount. After the plaintiff refused to sign the settlement agreement we filed a successful motion to enforce the settlement.
The plaintiff was an older woman who lived next door to the defendant. She was injured when she stepped out of her vehicle in a commonly-owned driveway and fell when her cane went into a fence post hole on the defendant’s property. The plaintiff claimed orthopedic injuries and required a future right knee arthroscopy and partial lateral meniscectomy. The plaintiff requested that the jury award $873,000, including future surgery and a life care plan. After an 8-day trial the jury awarded $20,835 in past medical expenses and $5,000 in past noneconomic damages, and found the plaintiff 75% negligent to arrive at a total verdict of $6,458.75.
The plaintiff was a tenant living in a residential property owned by the defendant. She was walking from the front porch of the property when she was struck by an overhead beam that fell from the eaves over the porch. The plaintiff claimed that the beam struck her with 3,800 pounds of force and caused her to sustain a mild traumatic brain injury. The plaintiff sustained a deviated septum requiring surgery, and experienced severe headaches, a compressed neck, back and shoulder injuries, facial scarring, memory impairment, vision impairment, tinnitus, depression and anxiety. The defendant contended the plaintiff did not sustain a mild traumatic brain injury and acknowledged she sustained a severe nose injury and would benefit from future counseling and psychological treatment. The plaintiff sought $2.2 million from the jury. Following a 10-day trial the jury returned a verdict of $90,101, consisting of $10,630 in past expenses, $69,471 in future medical expenses, and $10,000 in past noneconomic damages.
RECENT PRE-TRIAL RESULTS
Some cases warrant termination before trial. Below are recent cases we have successfully gotten dismissed prior to trial.
OTHER RECENT RESULTS
Most cases warrant resolution. Below are examples of types of cases we have recently settled successfully
to our clients’ satisfaction.
MASSERMAN & DUCEY
15260 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1740, Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
For any general inquiries, please fill in the following contact form: